Mazda 3 2013 vs Audi S3 2013

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Audi S3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 165 HP300 HP
Torque: 210 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds4.9 seconds
Audi S3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 135 HP less power than Audi S3, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Audi S3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.26.9
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi S3, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway930 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Leon
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.39 m
Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Audi S3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres390 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Audi S3.
Turning diameter: 10.6 metersno data
Gross weight: 1`815 kg2`000 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 11 80024 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi S3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv