Mazda 3 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 187 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 3 2011 and Mazda 3 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km9.0 l/100km
The Mazda 3 2011 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 2011 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2011 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2011 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway850 km on highway
660 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years13 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.49 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 2011 is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres430 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8201`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 50003600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv