Mazda 3 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 187 NM | 187 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2011 and Mazda 3 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Mazda 3 2011 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 2011 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2011 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2011 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Mazda 3 2011 is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |