Mazda 3 2011 vs Mercedes C class 2011

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Mercedes C class
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.1 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 115 HP120 HP
Torque: 270 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.8 seconds
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.34.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1270 km in combined cycle1200 km in combined cycle
1440 km on highway1370 km on highway
1010 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 470'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 5Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes Vito
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.59 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 1 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres475 litres
Mercedes C class has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8152`105
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54007400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes C klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv