Mazda 3 2011 vs Nissan Tiida 2007

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Nissan Tiida
2007 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 105 HP110 HP
Torque: 145 NM153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds11.1 seconds
Nissan Tiida is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Tiida, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Nissan Tiida. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.47.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.8 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway910 km on highway
740 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years19 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.53 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres467 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data467 litres
Nissan Tiida has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7451`658
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 50003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Nissan Tiida has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv