Mazda 3 2009 vs Mercedes C class 2007

 
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Mercedes C class
2007 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP204 HP
Torque: 187 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds8.6 seconds
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 54 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.99.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway940 km on highway
610 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda 3 2009 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 3 is 9 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres475 litres
Mercedes C class has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.84 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.44 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`770no data
Safety:
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 32005600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes C klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv