Mazda 3 2007 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007

 
Mazda 3
2007 - 2009
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2007 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 143 HP359 HP
Torque: 360 NM492 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds4.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 216 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 132 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.014.2
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 8.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1230 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle380 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway520 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 5 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 5Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.50 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Mazda 3 is smaller.
Mazda 3 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 413 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1285 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`9252`040
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 240037 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv