Mazda 3 2007 vs Mazda 3 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2007 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 2007 engine produces 33 HP more power than Mazda 3 2004, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Mazda 3 2004. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
The Mazda 3 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 2007 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2007 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2007 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2004. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 3 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2007 and Mazda 3 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | 675 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2007 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2004, which means Mazda 3 2007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |