Mazda 3 2006 vs Mazda 3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2006 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 3 2004, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 3 2006 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2004, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 2006 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | 675 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2006 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2004, which means Mazda 3 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |