Mazda 3 2006 vs Mazda 3 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | 675 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2006 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2003, which means Mazda 3 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |