Mazda 3 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 60 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Alfa Romeo GT, Alfa Romeo Spider, Alfa Romeo GTV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 6 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
675 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 33 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`675 kg | 1`770 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |