Mazda 3 2003 vs Chevrolet Lacetti 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 94 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 131 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 11 HP more power than Chevrolet Lacetti, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Chevrolet Lacetti. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Chevrolet Lacetti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Kalos | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Lacetti, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 405 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
675 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 3 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Lacetti. The Chevrolet Lacetti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`695 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 6.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Chevrolet Lacetti has
| |