Mazda 3 2013 vs Opel Astra 2015

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Opel Astra
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP110 HP
Torque: 380 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.13.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1290 km in combined cycle
1410 km on highway1450 km on highway
860 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.45 m1.49 m
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1210 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 53 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9101`870
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 78007200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv