Mazda 3 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf 2012

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8.6 seconds
Mazda 3 and Volkswagen Golf have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 torque is 60 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1250 km on highway
770 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.26 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`930no data
Safety:
The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 78008800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv