Mazda 3 2013 vs Ford Focus 2014

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8.7 seconds
Mazda 3 and Ford Focus have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 torque is 10 NM more than Ford Focus. Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.8
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1320 km on highway
770 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.36 m
Width: 1.80 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres362 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1263 litres1062 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`930 kg2`050 kg
Net weight:1`330 kg1`455 kg
Load capacity:600 kg595 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 68005600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • fewer faults
Ford Focus has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv