Mazda 3 2013 vs Ford Focus 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 187 HP | 350 HP | |
Torque: | 251 NM | 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
Mazda 3 engine produces 163 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 189 NM less than Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 460 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1045 litres | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 104 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 218 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`025 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7800 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |