Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 165 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM191 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds10.4 seconds
Mazda 3 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 3 2011, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mazda 3 2011. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Mazda 3 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 2013 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2013 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1030 km on highway
710 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 3 2013 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.46 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 2013 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 2013 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2011 (by 97 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2011.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`835
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 78005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv