Mazda 3 2013 vs Ford Focus 2014

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 155 HP250 HP
Torque: 201 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6.5 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 95 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 159 NM less than Ford Focus.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.06.8
Mazda 3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway1080 km on highway
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.36 m
Width: 1.76 m1.82 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 is 14 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres316 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1215 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 48 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 48 litres).
Turning diameter: no data12.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`025
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 78007600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Ford Focus has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv