Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 155 HP150 HP
Torque: 201 NM191 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.4 seconds
Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 3 2011, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda 3 2011.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.06.7
Mazda 3 2013 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2013 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway1030 km on highway
Mazda 3 2011 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 3 2013 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.46 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2013 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2011, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 2013 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2011 (by 97 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`835
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 78005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv