Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 3 2011, but torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 3 2011. Despite less power, Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 2013 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2013 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Mazda 3 2011 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Mazda 3 2013 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2011 (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2011. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |