Mazda 3 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 23 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 24 NM more than Kia Ceed. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 20 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |