Mazda 3 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2013

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Hyundai i30
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP135 HP
Torque: 210 NM164 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 15 HP less power than Hyundai i30, but torque is 46 NM more than Hyundai i30. Despite less power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1000 km on highway
690 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Hyundai i30 2013 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ...  More about Hyundai i30 2013 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.30 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres378 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 14 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`850
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i30 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 78005000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Hyundai i30 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv