Mazda 3 2013 vs Honda Civic 2012

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Honda Civic
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP142 HP
Torque: 210 NM174 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds9.1 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 22 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 36 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1020 km on highway
770 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.30 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litresno data
Honda Civic has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 113 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`815no data
Safety:
The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Civic, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 76007400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Honda Civic has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv