Mazda 3 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 and Volvo V40 have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 torque is 110 NM less than Volvo V40. Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 3.6 | |
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1720 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 1820 km on highway | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1500 litres | |
Mazda 3 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 237 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 7800 | 13 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |