Mazda 3 2013 vs Seat Toledo 2013

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Seat Toledo
2013 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP75 HP
Torque: 210 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds13.9 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 75 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.9
Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway1190 km on highway
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.48 m
Width: 1.80 m1.71 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litresno data
Seat Toledo has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 186 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`595
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 700010 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Seat Toledo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv