Mazda 3 2013 vs Nissan Leaf 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 41 HP more power than Nissan Leaf, but torque is 40 NM less than Nissan Leaf. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 15.0 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 10.90 € at€/l | 4.50 € at€/kWh | |
| Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. | |||
| Range per fill-up: | 820 km in combined cycle | 250 km in combined cycle | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower. Mazda 3 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Leaf, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 720 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Leaf. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 543 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Leaf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |