Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 3 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 2013 torque is 23 NM more than Mazda 3 2011. Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.27.6
The Mazda 3 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2013 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway940 km on highway
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 3 2013 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.46 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 2013 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 2013 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2011 (by 97 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2011.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`835
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 78005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv