Mazda 3 2013 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulietta is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Giulietta, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Alfa Romeo Giulietta. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.0 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Giulietta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Giulietta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 3 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Giulietta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Alfa Romeo Giulietta is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo Giulietta has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Alfa Romeo Giulietta has
| |