Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 104 HP105 HP
Torque: 144 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds12.2 seconds
Mazda 3 2011 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 3 2011, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 3 2011. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Mazda 3 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 2013 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2013 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.46 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 2013 is larger.
Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 2013 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2011 (by 97 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2011.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 74005000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv