Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Body: HatchbackHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain
Power: 104 HP105 HP
Torque: 144 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds12.2 seconds
Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 3 2011, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 3 2011. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.
Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.4
Mazda 3 2013 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years
Length: 4.47 m4.46 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 308 litres340 litres
Mazda 3 2013 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2011.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 13 2005200
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Contact us: [email protected]