Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Body: | Hatchback | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
| Power: | 104 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 3 2011, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 3 2011. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
| Mazda 3 2013 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2013 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 308 litres | 340 litres | |
| Mazda 3 2013 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2011. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 5200 | |
|
| ||