Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2011 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2013 engine produces 110 HP less power than Mazda 3 2011, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 9.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2013 consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 2013 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda CX-7 | Used also on Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 3 2011 2.3 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its capacity is quite limited. The engine also requires high quality fuel and tends to use more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2013 is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2011, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 2013 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 3 2013 has 64 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. The Mazda 3 2011 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2011 (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2013 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2011, which means Mazda 3 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |