Mazda 3 2013 vs Audi A3 2013

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Audi A3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP180 HP
Torque: 380 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds7.3 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi A3, but torque is 130 NM more than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.15.6
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1410 km on highway1040 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.31 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 15 cm longer than the Audi A3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1220 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 43 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9101`840
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 780010 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv