Mazda 3 2011 vs Nissan Leaf 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Leaf, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Leaf. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | 15.0 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 11.80 € at€/l | 4.50 € at€/kWh | |
| Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. | |||
| Range per fill-up: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 250 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Leaf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 720 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Leaf. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 640 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Nissan Leaf has
| |