Mazda 3 2011 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2010

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Alfa Romeo Giulietta
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP105 HP
Torque: 270 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11.3 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Alfa Romeo Giulietta, but torque is 50 NM less than Alfa Romeo Giulietta. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.34.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.6 l/100km
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1270 km in combined cycle1360 km in combined cycle
1440 km on highway1620 km on highway
1010 km with real consumption1070 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo Giulietta gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.35 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo Giulietta has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 48005800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo Giulietta has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv