Mazda 3 2011 vs Seat Toledo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 210 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |