Mazda 3 2011 vs Seat Toledo 2013

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Seat Toledo
2013 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP75 HP
Torque: 145 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds13.9 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.9
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1190 km on highway
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.71 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litresno data
Seat Toledo has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 210 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`595
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 500010 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Seat Toledo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv