Mazda 3 2011 vs Nissan Leaf 2013

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Nissan Leaf
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 PetrolElectric

Performance

Power: 105 HP109 HP
Torque: 145 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds11.5 seconds
Nissan Leaf is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 4 HP less power than Nissan Leaf, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Nissan Leaf. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Consumption: 6.4 l/100km15.0 kWh/100km
Fuel cost per 100km: 10.30 € at€/l 4.50 € at€/kWh
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country.
Range per fill-up: 850 km in combined cycle250 km in combined cycle
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.45 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.55 m
Mazda 3 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Leaf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litres720 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Leaf. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 640 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`945
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 50008400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more mileage per fill-up
  • lower price
Nissan Leaf has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv