Mazda 3 2011 vs Honda Insight 2012

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Honda Insight
2012 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP88 HP
Torque: 145 NM121 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds12.4 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 17 HP more power than Honda Insight, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Honda Insight. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.44.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km5.0 l/100km
The Honda Insight is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Insight, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 345 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Insight.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1000 km on highway
740 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)125 mm (4.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.40 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 7 cm longer than the Honda Insight, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres339 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litres1017 litres
Mazda 3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Honda Insight. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 343 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda Insight, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 50005000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
Honda Insight has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv