Mazda 3 2011 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2010

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Alfa Romeo Giulietta
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 145 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds11.3 seconds
Alfa Romeo Giulietta is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 torque is 175 NM less than Alfa Romeo Giulietta. Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.44.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Alfa Romeo Giulietta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 300 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle1360 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1620 km on highway
740 km with real consumption1070 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo Giulietta gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.35 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Giulietta. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo Giulietta has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 52006600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo Giulietta has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv