Mazda 3 2011 vs BMW 1 series 2005

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
BMW 1 series
2005 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP129 HP
Torque: 191 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds9.4 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 21 HP more power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 11 NM more than BMW 1 series. Despite the higher power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.9 l/100km
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway870 km on highway
670 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1, BMW Z4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 1 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda 3 2011 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.23 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 23 cm longer than the BMW 1 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litres1150 litres
Mazda 3 has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW 1 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 210 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 1 series, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`760
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 315 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 50003000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
BMW 1 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv