Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 3 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 260 HP | 260 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
590 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 320'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 1360 litres | |
Mazda 3 2009 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 2009 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2011. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2009 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2011, which means Mazda 3 2009 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`925 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |