Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 3 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
Mazda 3 2009 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 1360 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |