Mazda 3 2009 vs Honda Insight 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 7 HP more power than Honda Insight. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Insight is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Insight, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Insight. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 7 cm longer than the Honda Insight, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Insight scores higher in safety tests, butMazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Insight scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Insight has
| |