Mazda 3 2009 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 45 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.6 | |
| Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |