Mazda 3 2003 vs Opel Astra 2004

 
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Opel Astra
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP170 HP
Torque: 187 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway750 km on highway
640 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.25 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 24 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
635 litres1330 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 695 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7451`860
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Opel Astra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Opel Astra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv