Mazda 3 2004 vs Opel Astra 2004

 
Mazda 3
2004 - 2006
Opel Astra
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP80 HP
Torque: 245 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds15 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.04.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1260 km on highway
930 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.25 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 17 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
635 litres1330 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 695 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7851`840
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Opel Astra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Opel Astra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv