Mazda 3 2003 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997

 
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Mitsubishi Carisma
1997 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 105 HP125 HP
Torque: 145 NM174 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway1110 km on highway
700 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years23 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Galant
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Carisma might be a better choice in this respect.
Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.71 m
Height: 1.46 m1.40 m
Mazda 3 is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
635 litres660 litres
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 130 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 25 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`685
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv