Mazda 3 2004 vs Toyota Corolla 2004

 
Mazda 3
2004 - 2006
Toyota Corolla
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 84 HP97 HP
Torque: 122 NM130 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.3 seconds12 seconds
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 13 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway960 km on highway
750 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 2Used also on Toyota Auris
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.18 m
Width: 1.76 m1.71 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 is 24 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
635 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002000
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv