Mazda 3 2019 vs Kia Optima 2018

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
Kia Optima
2018 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 191 HP188 HP
Torque: 252 NM241 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.1 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 3 HP more power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Kia Optima.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.3
Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway1120 km on highway
Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 140 mm (5.5 inches)135 mm (5.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.86 m
Width: 1.80 m1.86 m
Height: 1.44 m1.49 m
Mazda 3 is smaller.
Mazda 3 is 20 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 374 litres510 litres
Kia Optima has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 136 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`850 kg2`050 kg
Net weight:1`417 kg1`465 kg
Load capacity:433 kg585 kg
Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Kia Optima. Therefore, Kia Optima is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 14 80013 000
Pros and Cons:
    Kia Optima has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv