Mazda 3 2019 vs BMW 3 series 2018

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
BMW 3 series
2018 - 2022
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP382 HP
Torque: 434 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 132 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 66 NM less than BMW 3 series.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.79.4
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
640 km on highway750 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
BMW 3 sērija 2018 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.71 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 374 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight: 1`950 kgno data
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 14 80028 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv