Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2019 engine produces 21 HP more power than Mazda 3 2016, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda 3 2016. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2019 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2016 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 2016 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1026 litres | 1334 litres | |
| Mazda 3 2019 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2016 (by 308 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`952 kg | 1`815 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`349 kg | 1`334 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 603 kg | 481 kg | |
| Mazda 3 2019 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Mazda 3 2016. Therefore, Mazda 3 2019 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |