Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2018

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
Mazda 3
2018 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 186 HP184 HP
Torque: 252 NM251 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 3 2019 engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 3 2018, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mazda 3 2018.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.8
The Mazda 3 2018 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2018, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2019 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
640 km on highway760 km on highway
Mazda 3 2018 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2018, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 569 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1019 litres1334 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 3 2019 has 205 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2018. The Mazda 3 2018 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2018 (by 315 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 21 00010 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv