Mazda 3 2018 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2018 engine produces 35 HP more power than Mazda 3 2016, but torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 3 2016. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2018 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2018 could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Mazda 3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 2018 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 2018 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. This could mean that the Mazda 3 2018 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |